Matt Love
The Truth Patriot
September 14, 2009
It usually takes 6 to 9 months to develop a flu vaccine AFTER the flu strain has been identified. The traditional process is to inject viral material into chicken eggs and then to harvest the antibodies that are produced. This is a time intensive process, and a way to speed up the production of vaccine has been sought, and has been found.
The foremost way to streamline the process involves taking human cells, instead of eggs, and using them as the medium in which to grow the viral material to produce the desired vaccine. In looking into this new process, I found that one company in particular has a line of cellular material that they license to other major pharmaceutical companies so that they can create pharmaceutical products. These products include flu vaccines.
The company is called Crucell. It actually has multiple lines of human cell material, but one in particular, called PER.C6, is marketed to be used to develop vaccines. What the company does not announce publicly is that the cell line was derived from an aborted baby.
PER.C6 cells are derived from embryonic retina cells of an aborted fetus. These cells were taken from the eye of a baby aborted in 1972 and frozen. In 1985 they were unfrozen and used to start this cell line. This aborted baby’s cells have been reproduced and distributed to other pharmaceutical companies to be injected into millions of people’s bodies. This cell line is pronounced as “Percy Six.”
The United States Food and Drug Administration is aware of the source of this cell line. In 2001 the FDA held meetings at which testimony was given concerning PER.C6.
Crucell states on their website that the PER.C6 cell line has been marketed to other pharmaceutical companies and has been used in a number of vaccines. According to the company’s website, “PER.C6® technology is being used in Crucell’s programs for the development of vaccines against tuberculosis, malaria, influenza, Ebola and Marburg.” Added to this list is now H1N1 swine flu vaccine.
Listed among Crucell’s customers for its PER.C6 cell line are some of the world’s largest drug makers. One of them is Sanofi Pasteur. According to their website, they are using the PER.C6 cell line for their swine flu vaccine, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services has awarded them a contract.
The U.S. government recently contracted with Novartis to deliver $289 million dollars worth of flu vaccine. Novartis declares on their website that they are using cell-based technology to speed up the process, instead of the older egg based technology. According to Crucell’s website, Novartis contracted with them to use PER.C6 in December, 2004. You can view the following page to identify all companies that have contracted to use this aborted fetal line.
Tune in Saturdays at 8pm
One if the most highly misunderstood notions among moral theologians and ethicists is that the abortions involved were not done with the intention of creating vaccines. In fact, in response to President Bush’s decision on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research (ESCR), the USCCB highlights this point as follows:
“In the present case, human lives were taken in order to provide cells for research and, in some cases, precisely to qualify for federal grants; in the case of vaccines, tissues were taken following abortions performed for unrelated reasons.” -(The NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, Vol. 12, No. 4 Aug-Sept 2001, The Human Embryo as Research Commodity Special Edition)
It was the intent of the abortionist and the researcher to destroy these babies specifically for vaccine manufacturing. But first, the abortions had to be pre-arranged so the researchers were available to immediately preserve the tissues.
"In order to sustain 96% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion"-Dr. C. Ward Kischer
"Within one the cells would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimens useless."-[Dr. C. Ward Kischer, Embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy; Specialist in Human Embryology, University of Arizona College of Medicine (Tucson, Arizona) Personal interview 7-02, ALL Conference]
Now, aside from all the evidence, the fact that the swine flu vaccinations were rushed through the security checks, and the fact that 50% of doctors are actually rejecting the swine flu vaccine altogether, more importantly is the fact that our United states government now has mandatory vaccination policies in place all over the country that effectively take away our right to refuse the injection regardless of our biblical, personal, or moral beliefs.
Is it a just cause to intentionally inflict death on an unborn child just to mass produce a vaccine with many toxic additives as quickly as possible? Are you going to take that shot? If this isn't enough reason alone to refuse it and take action now, perhaps you should read into the ingredients list that we posted here.
To my many Christian friends out there, I leave you with one question when faced with adversity from an out of control Government that defies the law of God. What would Jesus do? I'll leave that answer up to you and your creator...
For everyone else, I suggest you take action if you haven't already. If you are local, please contact me as we have a plan of action in place. If you are from out of town, I suggest you start within your local government using the following resource as a good start:
http://childhoodshots.com/Swine_Flu_Plan.php
0 comments:
Post a Comment